Skip to content

  1. The Joys of Horse Shopping

    By John Strassburger, May 16, 2013
    Ianto

    Shopping for a horse gives you a chance to practice your translation skills.

    Yes, the title is ironic: Whenever I hear someone talking with giddy delight about the prospect of horse shopping, I find myself inwardly cringing and thinking, “greenhorn.” Because anyone who has actually ever horse shopped knows that the agony is just this side of the Bataan Death March, but with tack.  And whether you’re the buyer or the seller, the experience can leave you curled up in the fetal position, whimpering.

    No one gets off easy—it’s equally miserable for everyone.

    The first joy is the introductory call or email, where the buyer (or buyer’s agent) and seller connect for the first time to discuss the prospective animal.  This is often a great place to practice your linguistics skills and your translation abilities. Here are a few examples:

    Translation for buyers: The ad says that the horse needs “no maintenance.” What they actually mean is,  “We’ve not done anything about his hitchy right hind leg in the five years we’ve had him.” Or the seller boasts that he’s “been ridden by children.” What that actually means is that it happened once, “on a longe line in an arena, and he hasn’t left the arena or done anything else in 10 years, so when you try to take him home he’s going to have a breakdown.”

    Translation for sellers: It helps if you can guess what the buyer isn’t saying, usually by leaving off the ends of the sentences. For instance, if they say, “I’ve jumped 3’6,”they’ve left off “25 years ago, once, on a school horse whose name I don’t even remember.” Or if they say, “I want something competitive,” what they’ve left off is “because my trainer hasn’t had the heart to tell me that the problem with my current partnership is not the horse.”

    The next joy is the trial ride, where buyer and seller meet for the first time over the equine under consideration. Think of it as the worst blind date you’ll ever have. One side is pretty much sure the other side is a criminal out to rob them blind, and the other is desperate to be liked but is hoping that the person driving in their driveway isn’t actually an axe murderer.

    This is one of those moments that should be fun, but it’s really mostly dreadful. If you’re the buyer, you have to try to feel comfortable on a strange horse, in a strange setting, while being stared at by strangers who may be thinking that you’re ruining their lovely horse. As the seller, you’re letting a complete stranger climb up on your horse, and you’re simultaneously praying the beast behaves itself and hoping the person rides half as well as they claimed to. (Don’t forget to have the buyer sign the liability release form!)

    If, by some miracle, everything goes well with the trial ride—and the second trial ride, and the trainer watching the video, and then the trainer coming to try the horse, and (I swear this has happened to me) the childhood friend who once owned a horse that looked like your horse coming to see him—you then progress to the next joy, the pre-purchase exam. This would seem to be a relatively straightforward step, right? I mean, it’s science, yes or no, thumbs up or thumbs down, right? If it only it were so crystal clear!

    Here’s a fun vetting fact: Thanks to the marvelous leap forward in technology, vets can now see things on x-rays and ultrasounds that would have been impossible to see only10 years ago. But the tricky bit is that no one can tell you whether that little spur on the joint is an issue, or whether that shadow on the bone is actually a precursor of lameness or just something that horses have always had (and been sound with) but we never noticed before.

    Along with the pre-purchase exam, you have the fun little thing called expectations (mostly the buyer’s expectations): The most common one is expecting that a 15-year-old, experienced campaigner will have legs that look like an untested 4-year-old’s (or that it needs to). Surprise—he doesn’t. The buyer wanted a horse with mileage—what does she or he think mileage looks like on legs?

    Also, while most vets are educated, experienced and carefully judicial, sometimes you get an outlier, the practitioner who was available for this exam because no one else uses him. An example is the vet who once told me (I’m not making this up) that he would never pass an off-the-track Thoroughbred for an eventer because everyone knows that Thoroughbreds don’t like water.  What? And on what planet is that a parameter of your examination?

    But miracles do happen, so let’s assume that a buyer and a seller have agreed on the horse’s qualities, that a vet has been satisfied, and that a deal has been struck.  But both parties still have more joy to endure, additional periods of misery to suffer. For the seller, the time between the handshake and the horse being taken away by the buyer is one filled with terrible dread: What if the beast manages to hurt himself before departure? Should I keep him in his still or still turn him out? But what if he gets gassy and colicky because I’m keeping him in? Maybe I’ll just sleep in the stall . . .

    For the buyer, there period of misery comes a bit later, because after decades in the horse world I can say I’ve never known a single person who, about two weeks after buying a new horse, no matter how fabulous, hasn’t experienced a crushing case of buyer’s remorse. Sometimes it’s done in public, sometimes it’s private—crying, “What have I done?” in your shower at night. The good news is that it usually passes after a few convulsions, some minor alcoholism, and the turning of the earth.

    I always say—and I firmly believe—that the right horse exists for everyone and that the right person exists for every horse. But the process of getting there is often rather messy.

    And not even a little bit fun.

    >> Add Comment

    Tags: ,

  2. How I’d Save Thoroughbred Racing

    By John Strassburger, May 10, 2013
    DEl Mar

    Del Mar (Calif.) has a short, top-quality and successful season each summer.

    An article called “Twilight At The Track” in the May 13 issue of Time (scheduled, I’m sure, to coincide with the Kentucky Derby and the Triple Crown) really caught my attention. And since I’m a long-time follower of Thoroughbred racing, my subject this week is how I’d save Thoroughbred racing from drifting into the night.

    I began handicapping the races at the New York tracks when I was a teenager 40 years ago, and I later spent about a decade as an amateur steeplechase jockey. And since 2000 I’ve spent absolutely countless hours watching racing from “coast to coast” on TVG, America’s horse racing network, because I just like to watch horses race. As a former race rider, I like to watch for the jockeys’ strategy; I like watching for horses coming on late and seeing if frontrunners can stay there. I like admiring horses with heart.

    Plus, the art of handicapping is fascinating to me—I like listening to Simon Bray, Matt Carothers and Todd Schrupp discuss the horses’ chances and predicting the race. But I’ve never bet a cent through TVG’s website; a couple times I’ve had an inkling to try, but I’m just too cheap to bet my own money.

    The only times I’ve bet in the 13 years I’ve been watching TVG have been on three occasions I’ve gone to track; twice to Charles Town (in West Virginia), when we lived in Northern Virginia, and last September, when we went to Golden Gate Fields outside of Oakland. I actually won about $30 that day.

    Our day at Golden Gate was a lovely one, starting with beautiful weather at an attractive and well-designed track. We used the valet parking and then ate in the clubhouse for a very reasonable price. In the comfortable clubhouse, our six-person party enjoyed our own table right up against the windows overlooking the finish line for the entire afternoon. From there, it was an easy walk to the betting windows or down to the paddock or out on to the apron. But the place was nearly empty—I don’t think there were more than 3,000 people in the grandstand, including the employees. We wondered when we left, “How do they keep this place open?”

    Turns out, that’s a good question. The Time article quotes a 2011 study commissioned by The Jockey Club that found betting handle was down 37%, attendance was down 30%, and starts per horse and race days were down 14%. The article’s conclusion? That Thoroughbred racing is in an irreversible downward spiral. I hope that’s an overly dire prediction.

    I’ve enjoyed watching the races at five of our country’s premier tracks: Belmont Park in New York, Monmouth Park in New Jersey, Saratoga in New York, Keeneland in Kentucky, and Santa Anita in California.

    I’ve also been to two middle-of-the-road tracks: Delaware Park and Golden Gate Fields. And I’ve been to four tracks that are at the low end of the spectrum: Charles Town, Penn National in central Pennsylvania, Canterbury Park in Minnesota, and our own Sonoma County Fair.

    What’s the difference between these three groups? In a word, quality. Quality of the facility (beauty, upkeep, cleanliness, food); quality of the horses and, thus, of the racing you watch; and quality of the experience. A high-class track and top-quality horses gives your time there an aura of a special event, like watching an NFL game or a baseball playoff game.  You go home feeling excited, checking your calendar to see when you can go back again. But you have to be a real fan of horse racing or a dedicated gambler to enjoy a work-a-day afternoon or evening at Golden Gate or Penn National enough to want to go back.

    What could the leaders of horse racing do to save their game? Well, the biggest thing would be to make it a unified sport, like the NFL or even like NASCAR. But it’s not—Thoroughbred racing is several dozen state or regional associations that are dealing with state legislatures hungry for tax revenue and able to claim jurisdiction because states have a legal right to oversee gambling. And those legislatures each have different priorities and expertise. They can’t even agree on how to license trainers and jockeys or on which medications to permit.

    So, admitting that the change that would make the most sense won’t happen, what could be possible? I think the biggest thing would be to market the sport as more about the horses and the people and less about the betting. The betting is necessary for many reasons, but part of racing’s problem is that it’s continued to rely on betting in a world where people who want to gamble now have dozens of choices, most of which are far easier and have better odds.

    So use something else—how about the horses, without whom there wouldn’t’ be any racing? Race the big stars longer so they can develop a following; use social media better to develop that following; have regular “meet-the-horses” days at the track. I offer Zenyatta as an example of a charismatic star who drew people to the track for several years. And remember Secretariat and his immensely likeable owner Penny Tweedy? How huge would they have been with Facebook?

    Bring in owners and trainers and jockeys to talk to the fans and sign autographs. I still vividly remember when I was a kid going with my family to a program called “Breakfast at Monmouth,” where you could sit next to the track and watch horses work in the early morning, listen to track personnel and others explain things about the racing, and have a nice breakfast. Programs like this could take people on tours of the barns and other parts of the track too.

    They could also try having shorter seasons at each track, and better coordination between tracks in a region, so they aren’t fighting for horses, fans and media attention. When I was a kid in the ‘70s and closely following racing, New York’s Aqueduct closed just before Christmas and then re-opened in early March, mostly because winter made racing unattractive if not impossible. So there were distinct seasons, and horsemen and fans looked forward to the beginning and culmination of both. Then, in the mid-70s, Aqueduct put in an all-weather inner track so they could run non-stop through the winter. The result wasn’t more fans or better racing.

    A good example of coordination is Churchill Downs and Keeneland in Kentucky, or the three tracks administered by the New York Racing Association, because their dates never overlap. The horses and the people move from track to track. Today’s most successful meets are short and focused, with high purses, top-quality racing, lots of fans, and heavy media attention. I’m talking about Keeneland’s two meets a year (April and October) and Saratoga and Del Mar (California) in July/August.

    Those are the three meets that I (and many other racing and TVG fans) look forward to every year, because of their quality and excitement.

    >> Add Comment

    Tags: , , ,

  3. “Crew Shots” From The Rolex Kentucky Three-Day Event

    By John Strassburger, May 2, 2013
    R-star

    While Kristi Nunnink and R-Star were on course at Rolex Kentucky, their crew waited anxiously at the finish.

    This year marked the 18th time in 19 years I’ve attended the Rolex Kentucky Three-Day event (writes my wife, Heather Bailey, in this week’s blog). Sixteen of those times I was there as either a member of the press or a member of the media center staff, but it’s the other two times that have extra-special meaning for me.

    There isn’t any part of this show I don’t enjoy, but the moment that warms my heart and makes me feel nostalgic is what I call the “crew shot.” It’s a moment that many people never see, unless they’re standing at the finish line or carefully watching the online cross-country coverage. It happens after horse and rider have cantered across the finish line of the cross-country course (either in triumph or defeat), when a mob of people comes running to greet the horse and rider. They give hugs to the riders and pats to the horses, as they start ripping the tack off and offering water to both.

    If you’re a top-level professional, some of that crew is probably paid grooms (although I’ve seen plenty of owners and family members in there, no matter how famous the rider), but if you’re one of the first-timers (there were a record 13 this time) or a lesser-known pro, your crew is likely made up of friends, family and sundry others.

    The first two times I went to Rolex, I was one of those crew. I was grooming for my best friend, a 20-something rider, trying to make a name for herself with, first, a backyard-bred Hanoverian with a heart as big as all out doors and front legs that looked like Charlie Chaplin’s and then with a rescued Mexican off-the-track-Thoroughbred.

    I attended Kentucky those years at my own expense; I left the hotel in the dark and returned in the dark, and I was hungry, cold and tired much of the weekend. And it was utterly fantastic. I cried when she galloped across the finish line—both times. There were hugs, and tears, and moments when the stress made us all snap at each other (which was usually followed by more hugs and tears), and at the end of the weekend, with ribbons in hand, we watched the Kentucky Horse Park disappear behind us and tried to commit every moment of it to memory.

    So I get a little misty when I watch that moment happen again and again at the finish line. This weekend, I saw Kristi Nunnink and her horse R-Star (“Rosie”) being looked after by her childhood friend Val Owen and Buck Davidson being aided by both of his parents, even though they were divorced years ago. I saw moms wielding sweat scrapers, dads carrying muddy tack, and barn rats of all ages walking, carrying, spongeing and scraping. I saw owners who wouldn’t be out of place in the fanciest of society pages up to their arms in mud and ice water and husbands and parents watching cross-country rounds through their fingers on the in-box TV screen, like teenagers watching the latest exploits of Freddy or Jason.

    For the riders who come home clear, it’s all high fives, slaps on the back, and smiles and champagne all around. For those whose weekends don’t go as planned, it’s tears and hugs and “It’ll be OK, you’ll get ‘em next time.” I suspect that’s when those contributions of friends and family are even more important. Everybody loves a winner, but it’s the guys who don’t win that need people around them who can make them feel like a winner.

    Eventing has always been a sport of teamwork, especially between the horses and their riders. But the “team” is really a huge conglomeration of people who love that horse and rider in such a pure way that they give up money, time, sleep and their natural hair color just to be there to support them (because watching someone you love do a four-star, no matter how well they do it, causes gray hair).

    I know the riders appreciate their crews. But when I watch the footage shown online or on TV, I often wonder if those watching at home know who that group of people rushing to the horse and rider are, or if they just think, “Wow, a lot of groupies that person has.”

    I’ve been a paid groom at big competitions, as well a “friend groom.” I’ve groomed for my husband at many events, and I’ve groomed for horses I owned or bred who were being ridden by professionals. It’s a labor of love that’s both heavy on the labor and heavy on the love. And I wouldn’t trade those memories for the world.

     

    >> Add Comment

    Tags: ,

  4. The Next Career for Thoroughbreds

    By John Strassburger, April 24, 2013

    Like almost every Thoroughbred I've ever ridden, Merlin's greatest asset was his heart, his refusal to give up.

    Since the Rolex Kentucky Three-Day Event is the best-attended equestrian competition in the U.S., each year many organizations and corporations plan events to coincide with it. So, for the second year in a row, the Retired Racehorse Training Project will team up with New Vocations Racehorse Adoption Program to present an evening all about Thoroughbreds, this time on Friday evening, at West Wind Farm 10 miles from the Kentucky Horse Park.

    Both groups’ goal is to demonstrate that Thoroughbreds who’ve retired from racing are more than capable of international competition, and Rolex Kentucky provides them with strong evidence. Some 16 Former racehorses are slated to start, with at least  one of them—Can’t Fire Me (Becky Holder)—being a strong contender for a top-10 finish. Becky has previously placed several times at Rolex Kentucky on Courageous Comet, a Thoroughbred who was a stakes winner on the flat before Becky found him. Comet’s career ended in a glorious retirement just last fall.

    There are also going to be several Thoroughbreds who never raced running at Rolex Kentucky, and one them—Gin ‘N Juice (Hawley Bennett of Canada)—is a serious top-five contender. Ginny and Hawley, who represented Canada at the 2012 Olympics, have been competing in four-stars since 2009, and they’ve won all three of their advanced starts this spring, including, most recently, the Galway Downs CIC3* in California.

    Friday’s Thoroughbred event will feature several top event riders, including former Rolex Kentucky winner Phillip Dutton and Dorothy Crowell, who won the individual silver medal at the 1994 World Championships on Molokai, a Kentucky-bred former racehorse she bought as soon as his brief racing career ended. In my mind, Molokai should be the poster child for former Thoroughbred racehorses.

    Over the last three decades, my wife, Heather, or I have owned 13 Thoroughbred former race horses, and we’ve each worked with about half a dozen more owned by other people. In addition, we’ve owned six other Thoroughbreds who didn’t race, one of whom we bred.

    Let me tell you a little bit about four of the ones who raced, and two of the ones who didn’t, to illustrate why I think that the Thoroughbred is generally a fabulous animal that, honestly, simply isn’t for everyone.

    I bought Buddy in 1986 at the Charles Town Race Track in West Virginia. I went there one December morning with a steeplechase trainer friend of mine, and we really did walk from barn to barn looking at horses. We found this attractive and quiet 3-year-old (prophetically named Lazy Runner), watched him jog down the barn aisle, and I made an offer after one of the track vets did a cursory exam.

    That spring, I rode him in five flat races on the Virginia point-to-point circuit (placing in three of them), but he had poor front feet (one was a club foot), and shoeing and minor soundness issues convinced me to stop racing him. I then foxhunted him extensively and competed him through training level in eventing before selling him four years later.

    Buddy was a very willing and trainable horse, and he was an excellent jumper. But he had a long back and very poor feet, and he constantly ripped shoes off until he became suppler and his hoof shape and strength improved.

    Tabor was a beautifully athletic gray gelding by top sire Green Dancer, who sold as a yearling at Keeneland for about $400,000 but was a complete flop on the flat track. The same steeplechase trainer friend of mine found him somewhere with a slightly bowed tendon, and she trained him to win one hurdle race at a point-to-point. But he bowed that tendon again in that victory, and, afterward, she had no success trying to sell him because he was a powerful but anxious jumper. So she gave him to me, because I got along famously with him.

    1 Comment

    Tags: , ,

  5. What A Hoof Abscess Taught Me

    By John Strassburger, April 17, 2013
    Alba@Twin

    Because of a hoof abscess, Firebolt didn't get to attack the Twin Rivers cross-country course.

    Last weekend, at the Twin Rivers International Three-Day Event, I underwent one of the most frustrating experiences a rider can have on the verge of a major competition: Your otherwise tuned-up and healthy horse suffers a hoof abscess and you have to withdraw.

    Hoof abscesses are immensely frustrating because you can’t completely prevent them, because your horse goes suddenly lame (sometimes pathetically, three-legged lame), and because the abscess could pop out of the hoof in hours, in a day or two, or in weeks.

    This abscess occurred in the right front hoof of Firebolt, my wonderful Quarter Horse mare, about whom I’ve written frequently in this blog. We’d actually been soaking and wrapping her other front foot, since she’d cut the coronary band in the trailer the previous Friday. To prevent an infection (and a possible abscess), we put her on SMZ’s for five days, and I suspect that those antibiotics just delayed an abscess that was already brewing in the right hoof.

    We shipped the 260 miles to Twin Rivers on Wednesday morning, and I schooled her lightly that afternoon. Then I worked her in a dressage ring the next morning without concerns. Fortunately, following the riders’ briefing early on Thursday afternoon, I decided to do a few practice trots with her before I changed into my formal clothes for the first horse inspection. I was extremely surprised—and worried—when she trotted off noticeably lame.

    So I asked to see the FEI treating veterinarian, because I didn’t want to present a lame horse to the ground jury and get rejected. (That happened to me nine years ago, in my first CCI1* with my wonderful partner Master Merlin, and I didn’t want to repeat that experience!) The treating vet examined Firebolt, and, with her hoof testers, found she was clearly sore in the toe of her right front hoof. We each suspected an abscess, and she suggested that I could try icing her foot until the jog to decrease the pain enough so we could do the dressage the next day, in the hope that it would pop before then.

    But I decided not to ice or even try to present her, because it wasn’t worth the intense effort and anxiety. It’s tremendously embarrassing to be disqualified on the first horse inspection—the jury and your fellow competitors wonder why you even brought the horse if you doubted his soundness? Plus, I recalled that the one abscess she’d had before had taken a couple of days to pop.

    I decided right away to withdraw her, and told the veterinarian to scratch our names from the jog order.

    Two concerns helped me make such a quick decision. First, I would have ridden her anxiously and defensively, and, especially on a challenging cross-country course, that’s no way to ride. It guarantees failure on almost any horse, and since our relationship is based on complete trust in each other, I suspect she’d be able to tell if I were worried.

    Second, Firebolt has such a “throw-myself-on-top-of-the-hand-grenade” work ethic that she would have kept going despite the pain and possibly hurt something else, something that would have been far worse than an abscess. I absolutely didn’t want to do that to her.

    So feeling the intense disappointment of being all dressed up with nowhere to go, we walked back to Firebolt’s stall to soak her and then wrap her in Epsom salts and Betadine. I soaked her and wrapped her again on Friday morning, and when I took the wrap off that evening to soak her again, the smell and the black color of the goo in the diaper told me that the abscess had popped. The hoof was also cold with no pulse. To save myself further frustration, I didn’t jog her.

    With only one other horse to ride at Twin Rivers, I spent a great deal of time pondering why this inopportune abscess was so much less disappointing than the one Merlin suffered nine years ago. And I came up with several factors, in roughly reverse order of importance:

    First, I have more horses to ride than I did then. With Merlin, all my eggs were in his basket. Today I’ve got more baskets than Alba’s, although hers is the brightest and the best. I’ve got two more promising younger horses of my own, plus two or three students’ horses to compete. “There will be another day,” I could tell myself this time.

    Second, the atmosphere at West Coast events is generally more convivial than on the East Coast. You don’t feel such an intense pressure to win, place and move up to the next level. I don’t mean that as a criticism of either the East or the West. It’s just an observation that’s probably largely due to the fact that the greater distances out here prevent us from going head-to-head every week or two.

    Third, with Merlin the CCI1* we missed was to be a test of our abilities and our partnership that we hadn’t taken yet. Merlin was clearly a good horse and we needed to pass the test to move on, as he should. But we’d missed the test and were basically being held back a grade. (We would get there, though, subsequently finishing 10th and fourth.)

    This CCI1* was really just a technicality, a hoop that the FEI said we had to correctly jump through. We’ve already finished second in a CCI1* (with a fabulous cross-country day), but we’d lowered one too many show jumps to get the required qualifying score to do a CCI2*. And since this spring we’d completed two intermediate horse trials with clear cross-country rounds, as far as I was concerned, we’d already passed the test.

    Fourth, at age 53, I’m no longer in a rush to accomplish competitive goals. I love to compete my horses, but I’m in the late afternoon of my competitive career, and the dreams I had 30 years ago are simply not in reach any longer. Each event tells me where my training is going right and where it needs to be better. But I’m now doing it for my own education and my horses’ education. If that means we progress to the next level, fantastic. But if we don’t, well, we’ll just have to work harder to be perfect at whatever level we’re competing.

    Still, I couldn’t make myself watch the CCI1*. It was just too disappointing.

     

    >> Add Comment

    Tags: ,